Women like this exist

Seriously. They exist. Many more than you think. And they sometimes club together. Realise this before you go jailing men who suffer from their behaviour.

http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/my_stalker_returns/

Yes, I know NAWALT and that some men are batshit crazy too, but neither of those is the point of this post. Try not to get so easily confused.

Women never lie about serious sexual matters

http://mentalfloss.com/article/54643/woman-who-gave-birth-rabbits

Check your privilege

28 Days Later.

The plot (spoiler): An unbelievably fast acting virus is accidentally released turning virtually everyone in Britain into fearsome raging zombie automatons.

The primary concern of our hero survivor is to protect the innocence of the two girls he's with from the small band of uninfected but deeply disconsolate soldiers who rescued the threesome.

It doesn't matter how many others suffer or die as he pursues this quest. A pretty girl's tears trump absolutely everything else. Everything. The film never questions this.

Check your privilege.

Ladies first

Along with most of my demographic, I've lived under this sexism all my life.

The opposite of the way feminism wants to portray it.

The search for progress

An excellent paragraph from http://ofint2.blogspot.co.uk:

"...the egalitarian mania of the twentieth century, striving to find some sense of community with which to replace what went missing as the West abandoned Christianity, has impoverished psychology by its insistence on [the] denial of psychological realities and key human differences. As intellectuals have known since Adam Smith, advanced civilization requires division of labour. Thus we need basic human differences in drives and abilities. A proper search for ‘community’ must accept differences and use them — not deny them or, more generally, the role of biology in personality and society."

Not just 'a proper search for community', either, but 'a proper search for progress'.

Why equality doesn't work...

An interesting article in The Spearhead.

A comment from Vektor hits the nail on the head:
"There is no 'war' between men and women, because men [as a group] won’t fight against women. Feminism is at war with men and men won’t defend themselves. The average female may not identify as a Feminist, but she is clearly out for her own interests and will lobby and vote to advance them, even if they directly harm or take away rights from men. Women see themselves as a political group. Men do not. Men are raised to be disposable, ashamed to admit weakness, and conditioned to take care of everybody else first."

Women, fish and bicycles

A woman may sometimes feel that she needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

However, in the developed world women as a whole need men like fish need water.

Just look around at who farms the food, who builds the houses, who mends the roads, who repairs the plumbing etc. In a whole day’s active investigation you’ll be pushed to spot one woman doing anything like that around here, for example. I know, I’ve tried.

If every man in the developed world went on strike we’d all be dead within what… a month, tops? If women went on strike then life would be harder after a month, but few would have died as a result. It would take thirty years or more before society was effectively wiped out. Extend that to never, once men develop artificial human reproduction. Which they will.

Then we can start talking about gender equality if we want to.



But not until then.